Editor’s Note: This was originally published for FANGORIA on January 21, 2004, and we’re proud to share it as part of The Gingold Files.
Eli Roth, what were you thinking? Five audio commentaries on Lions Gateโs DVD of your horror cause cรฉlรจbre Cabin Fever? Were you trying to rival the Alien Quadrilogy and Lord of the Rings Extended Edition boxes in keeping DVD reviewers prisoners in front of their TVs for an entire weekend?
Well, OK, it wasnโt really a chore listening to whole lineup, since Roth is an enthusiastic speaker and heโs all over every one of โem, including the actorsโ commentaries. But itโs also true that at least two of them could have easily been combined into one, and itโs unlikely that most people will be compelled to sit through all five. So hereโs my humble opinion of where to startโฆ
As sometimes paradoxically happens, the track in which the director is the lone voice is more interesting than some of those on which heโs joined by his collaborators. Roth begins his solo talk by asserting that heโd rather discuss his life and love of horror than burrow into minute details about Cabin Fever, and launches into a highly entertaining biographical chronicle, from his childhood (when horror movies literally made him throw up) through his years at NYU film school (puncturing the pretentiousness of many student moviemakers), memorable encounters with Barbra Streisand and Martin Brest and into a history of how Cabin Fever was conceived, produced and sold. There are plenty of funny stories and savvy advice for aspiring directors along the way, and during the final third, he does get into specifics of certain scenes and has interesting things to say about those as well.
The second best commentary? Rather surprisingly, itโs the one Roth shares with star Rider Strong, of whom itโs said in the menus, โ[He] talked so damn much we had to move him to another track.โ Good thing, too; Strong is easily the best speaker among the cast, and if, as he says here, he wanted to change his image from his Boy Meets World TV rep, this is a big step in the right direction. Insightful and revealing while maintaining a good sense of humor about himself and his career, Strong makes a number of observant comments about his role, things that changed over the course of Cabinโs shoot, the difference in Hollywoodโs perception of TV drama stars and sitcom veterans and how much he enjoyed getting bloody for his part. He also brings out the best in Roth, who says more here about the characters than he does on the other two actor tracks.
Those commentaries, unfortunately, suffer in comparison. One teams Roth with James DeBello (whose slacker wiseguy performance was evidently no act) and Joey Kern, and the director shares the other with Jordan Ladd and Cerina Vincent. Both tracks are more chatty than informational, and while a few fun and unique stories are related on each, many anecdotes are repeated between these and the Strong commentaryโwhere they receive the best tellingโand sometimes within the same track. By the end of each, Roth is filling up the remaining time by bringing supporting players and even his parents in for their own contributionsโan admittedly fun touch.
Roth goes even further with this approach on the โfilmmaker commentary,โ which he shares with a revolving door of co-speakers, including producers Lauren Moews, Sam Froelich and Evan Astrowsky (who has the best reminiscences, including the day he spent filming dogs and squirrels and another when Roth directed in a gorilla suit), co-scripter Randy Pearlstein, cinematographer Scott Kevan, Lions Gate executives Jason Constantine and Peter Block and even, by phone, Rothโs old NYU professor Boris Frumin! (Whereโs KNB EFX?) The grab bag of points of view results in an amusingly eclectic listening experienceโone that also, like the actorsโ tracks, becomes a big Eli Roth lovefest at times. Oddly, over the course of all these chats, a few subjects still arenโt explored as much as they could beโthe movieโs union problems, for example, and the fact that David Lynch, for whom Roth once worked as an assistant, was touted as the filmโs executive producer during the early publicity. In addition, outtakes and deleted scenes are mentioned along the way that havenโt been included as supplements.
Thereโs plenty else here to compensate, though. A half-hour โBeneath the Skinโ documentary is best viewed after the movie (given the number of potential spoilers) and before the commentaries (given the amount of duplicated material). Itโs certainly worth a look due to the wealth of behind-the-scenes footage, including several filming-the-FX moments and highlighted by glimpses of an uncooperative dog that had to be replacedโand whose trainerโs face is blacked out in the doc! Weโre even taken to the movieโs triumphant Toronto Film Festival premiere, though the biggest treat is video of co-composer Angelo Badalamenti playing one of this themes on the piano.
Along the way, both Roth and Moews assert the movieโs appeal to females who dig goreโwhich makes it odd that a disc feature which places a hands-covering-the-eyes graphic over the nastier scenes is dubbed โChick Vision.โ (Wouldnโt โWimp Visionโ have been a little more inclusive?) This, and a โFamily Versionโ of the film (the title, some driving footage, and thatโs all, folks!) are funnier in concept than in result; much more amusing is The Rotten Fruit, a trio of early animated shorts co-directed by Roth that are delightfully sick in a South Park vein. Letting the last chapter selection menu run for a while leads to an amusing Easter egg, while โPancakesโ isโฆwell, best to let that one speak for itself. Youโll either laugh or you wonโt. I laughed.
One thingโs for sureโgiven how seat-of-the-pants the production was, a remarkably assured and professional-looking movie resulted. One element that hasnโt been given enough due is Kevanโs cinematography, which captures a remarkable and eerie rural ambience, with just the right use of color, lighting and shadow to make the audience feel like they really are stranded in the woods with the characters. The discโs 2.35:1 transfer is just beautiful, with an image that evokes the mood of the โ70s horror fare that inspired the movie but replaces grain with fine clarity and color. The Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround audio is stronger on Nathan Barr and Badalamentiโs score than the sound FX, but none of it sounds unbalanced, and as a whole it conveys the atmosphere of rural isolation quite nicely.