MEGAN IS MISSING (2011).

Editor’s Note: This was originally published for FANGORIA on May 3, 2011, and we’re proud to share it as part of The Gingold Files.

Megan Is Missing is a sleazy, hypocritical piece of lurid garbage hiding behind the fig leaf of Social Importance. It comes on like a clarion call to protest the victimization of young girls while it actually does everything it can to blame the victim.

Allegedly based on true events (though only tenuously, it turns out), Megan Is Missing has been, according to the opening title, โ€œassembled using cell phone transmissions, computer files, home videos and public news reports.โ€ A lot of these are video chats that tend not to be recorded in real life, but this is hardly the least plausible thing about the movieโ€”more on that shortly.

The plot (and SPOILERS are necessary to fully discuss this) is simple: Megan Stewart (Rachel Quinn) and Amy Herman (Amber Perkins) are a couple of young teenagers, best friends though theyโ€™re polar opposites. Megan is the Wild Child, indulging in sex and drugs at every turn, while Amy is the Good Girl, and apparently the only one at their school. Megan begins web-chatting with a guy who calls himself โ€œJoshโ€ and wonโ€™t let her see his face, and she vanishes after going to meet with him. Amy suspects โ€œJoshโ€ and tells the police about him, and he threatens her on another web chat. He then kidnaps her, and the movie ends with 22 minutes of camcorder footage of โ€œJoshโ€ imprisoning Amy, treating her like an animal, brutally raping her, revealing Meganโ€™s corpse to her, and finally burying her alive.

This final act is disturbing, all right, but then youโ€™d have to be a pretty incompetent filmmaker to point a camera at a 14-year-old being tortured, sexually ravaged and left to die a slow death and not have that effect on a viewer. The fact that Megan Is Missing wallows in Amyโ€™s degradation and mistreatment from the beginningโ€”Megan subtly puts her down, a boy tries to force himself on her at a party and then slaps her, classmates repeatedly insult herโ€”is made even more offensive by how cheap and dishonest the whole film is. To start with the comparatively less distasteful side, the story becomes completely contrived and unbelievable after Megan has disappeared. Once the authorities have become aware that Amy was present at Meganโ€™s chats with โ€œJosh,โ€ and has communicated with him herself, there is no way in reality that 1) her name and face would be allowed all over TV news, 2) her subsequent Internet use wouldnโ€™t be monitored and 3) sheโ€™d be allowed to wander off by herself into the woods where the villain could grab her.

Far more pernicious is the movieโ€™s presentation of Megan. When sheโ€™s not engaging in torrents of the crudest possible sex talk, sheโ€™s heedlessly indulging in the act, leavened only by a couple of brief, on-the-nose bouts of self-examination. Because thereโ€™s no other narrative reason for Megan to be characterized as such a raging slut, the only conclusion the movie leaves us with is that she brings her fate upon herself with this behavior, a grotesquely puritanical extrapolation of the sex=death message of the more unsavory slasher films. Writer/director Michael Goi apparently believes heโ€™s opening parentsโ€™ eyes to their childrenโ€™s true lives with the cavalcade of debauchery in Megan Is Missingโ€™s first half hour, but it comes off less as an examination of true teen experience than like a Larry Clark wet dream. The most objectionable scene has Megan describing, in lengthy and excruciatingly graphic detail and a tone suggesting sheโ€™s enjoying it, being forced to perform oral sex at age 10. Sheโ€™s ostensibly talking to Amy but, in the movieโ€™s visual scheme, is actually addressing the audience. Whoโ€™s exploiting whom here?

But of course, all this nasty stuff is being served up to reveal Truths We All Must Know to protect children from the predators of the world. Right? Nope, not at all. Megan Is Missing is repellent, manipulative schlock that feels like itโ€™s salivating over the very abuses it pretends to condemn. Whatever good intentions were involved in its conception are drowned in its relentless determination to shock rather than educate. The yawning chasm between Megan Is Missingโ€™s intended message and its debased impact is even reflected in the DVD case copy, which claims first that this is a story โ€œevery teen must knowโ€ and then that the movie โ€œis not intended for persons under the age of eighteen.โ€

That DVD includes Goiโ€™s detailed commentary about the production, a more anecdotal talk track by Perkins, Quinn and producer Mark Gragnani, a making-of segment and a deleted sceneโ€”all of which would be of greater interest if the final product wasnโ€™t so unpleasant. Thereโ€™s also a statement by Mark Klaas, whose daughter Polly was notoriously abducted and murdered in 1993โ€”a horrific tragedy whose reference here sadly feels like an attempt to bestow a sense of importance on a movie that hasnโ€™t earned it. It instead falls into a trend that has included newspaper ads extolling The Last House on the Left as a cautionary tale, and more recently, filmmaker David DeFalco odiously suggesting that a viewing of his Last House ripoff Chaos might have saved Natalee Hollowayโ€™s life. The only caution that should be raised with Megan Is Missing is to stay as far away from it as possible.

Similar Posts