Editor’s Note: This was originally published for FANGORIA on June 20, 2012, and we’re proud to share it as part of The Gingold Files.

Itโ€™s been a big summer for writer Seth Grahame-Smith and vampires. First came Tim Burtonโ€™s reimagining of Dark Shadows, which Grahame-Smith co-wrote, followed by the arrival of Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, which he scripted based on his own best-selling novel.

Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, which counts Burton among its producers, tracks Lincoln from his younger days through his years in the White House, all the while clandestinely slaying the bloodsuckers living among us. Trained by the mysterious Henry Sturges (Dominic Cooper), joined by childhood friend William Johnson (Anthony Mackie) and opposed by ambitious vampire Adam (Rufus Sewell), Lincoln swings a mean ax and takes part in some insane, over-the-top action setpieces courtesy of Russian director Timur Bekmambetov. As those who have read the book know and as Grahame-Smith explains, this screen incarnation is quite a different take than his bookโ€ฆ

You were in a unique position on Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, as the author of the book who also got to write the screenplay.

Yeah, I was excited for the opportunity, because I had always wanted to be a screenwriter. I had actually moved out to LA to do that, not to be an author. Iโ€™m kind of an accidental author, I guessโ€”I took an unexpected turn into writing books instead of moviesโ€”so Lincoln was an opportunity to get that first big-paying gig as a screenwriter. I was excited, I was intimidated and it turned out to be very, very difficult, because itโ€™s hard to adapt any book, but in adapting your own you have to deal with your own ego, and youโ€™re a little more precious than usual. Especially with this film, because people who know the book are going to see that the movie is vastly different in many ways, and that took a lot of work.

Is that a concernโ€”that die-hard fans of the book are going to come to the film and see something different?

On some level Iโ€™m concerned, but I also believe that you have to make the movie your director is interested in making. In this case, we all committed to making a big, muscular, over-the-top, visceral action-movie version, where the book is much more steeped in the minutiae of Lincolnโ€™s life and history. There are footnotes, itโ€™s very thoroughly researched and the fun of the book is the interweaving of real history and the genre story. The film has that interweaving of history, but youโ€™re also dealing with the guy who directed Wanted and Night Watch and Day Watch, so you know there are going to be these extraordinary and yet absurd sequences in it.

The main similarity between the book and the film is that, in both cases, the joke ends at the title. It is a crazy, absurd premiseโ€”some might even say ridiculous, and they would not be wrong to think thatโ€”but the joke ends at the title, and what follows is a very sort of sincere, straightforward execution of that idea. People ask me why I didnโ€™t do it as a comedy, and the reason is that it wouldnโ€™t be sustainable. I donโ€™t know a way to do that without being boring; putting a joke on top of a joke wouldnโ€™t work for me. Both of themโ€”not to get all preachy and grandiose about itโ€”do portray Lincoln in this very genre way, yes, but also stay true to the ideals of the man. We take this heroic life and we just make it superheroic.

Were you the only writer on the feature?

No. About a month before we started shooting, I went to London to work on Dark Shadows with Tim Burton. Simon Kinberg, one of the producers on Lincoln, came in and did a lot of production work with Timur, because Timur likes to rethink and invent as he goes. Heโ€™ll have an idea and he needs someone there to whip it into shape, so Simon did a good amount of work on that. And then once they put it all together, I came back in during post, wrote some additional scenes that were put in the movie and stayed on through voiceover, ADR and all that stuff.

Was there any trepidation about taking off for Dark Shadows and leaving your baby in the hands of others?

Yes, theyโ€™re certainly was. But ultimately, thatโ€™s the thing about film: When Iโ€™m writing a book, Iโ€™m in charge, but when youโ€™re on a movie, the director is in charge. In this case, whether it was me or Simon working with Timur, it was really Timur dictating what he wanted during the process. Sometimes we fought a little bit, and thatโ€™s healthyโ€”itโ€™s part of making a movie. But ultimately, itโ€™s Timurโ€™s version of my story.

It must have been interesting to have a filmmaker come from another country and take on this American icon.

Yeah, and thatโ€™s one of the great things about it. In America, we tend to put Lincoln on a pedestalโ€”and deservedly soโ€”but in doing that, you rob him of some of his humanity. Timur didnโ€™t have that baggage. His statues were of Lenin and Stalin, you know [laughs]? To him, Lincoln was just this guy on the $5 bill. So when he came on, he was much more interested in the man than the myth. Right in the beginning of the film, itโ€™s โ€œHistory prefers legends to menโ€ฆโ€ and that sets up the whole thing. Thatโ€™s really the whole approach to the movie, and thatโ€™s why Timur was, in a strange, Russian kind of way, the perfect director for this.

When it came to adding a central villain, the major action scenes, etc., did that take a bit of an adjustment on your part?

An adjustment is putting it mildly. It was a tectonic shift in thinking, was what it was. None of that was in the book. That was where the real labor of this was for me: letting go of the beats of the novel and boiling it down to what it was saying, what the ideas and themes were and how to preserve them and put them in the context of, โ€œWe need to make a big action movie.โ€ And in doing that, we needed a villain to espouse all the nastiness of the vampires. We had to invent Adam. And after having the opportunity to think about it, we were dealing with issues like slavery and there was no African-American voice in the book representing anything but the victimization side, and so where was the African-American fighting against this? Thatโ€™s where William Johnson comes from, who just happened to be a real person in Lincolnโ€™s life. Thatโ€™s one of the things I think the film does narratively better than the book, having Will there to join the fight with Lincoln. And then the big setpieces youโ€™re talking about, like the horse sequence.

Thatโ€™s one of the highlights of the film. Where did that idea come from?

That came from Timur. Actually, I donโ€™t think itโ€™s in the book, but I wrote an early draft in which they lay a trap for a vampire and he escapes on a horse. Timur took that and, in his own crazy Russian Timur mind, made it 1,000 horses. I love that sequence, but every time I see it, Iโ€™m like, โ€œThere are 50 horses in the corral, tops, and then they break out and itโ€™s like 50,000!โ€ [Laughs] Thatโ€™s just the way Timur approaches it. I mean, bullets donโ€™t bend either, but we all loved that in Wanted, soโ€ฆ Adam, Will, the horse sequence, the silver in the end, the Underground Railroad, the train sequenceโ€”none of that is in the book, so it was a wholesale reinvention. In a way, it was like writing a sequel to the book, where I was inventing something absolutely new. It reminds me of, if you go to Disney World and go on the Indiana Jones ride, itโ€™s kind of Indiana Jones, but itโ€™s completely different and all new, and itโ€™s the ride version of what the films are. This is exactly the same thing.

How do you feel about the way Dark Shadows turned out?

Well, itโ€™s pretty close to what I wrote. Look, Iโ€™m proud of the film. I think you can make valid criticisms that the third act gets a little crazy and that tonally itโ€™s doing a lot of things at once, but again, it tries to be weird and different. To me, itโ€™s a very Tim Burton-y Tim Burton film. Thatโ€™s all I ever really wanted it to be. Obviously Iโ€™m disappointed that it didnโ€™t do better, but I loved the experience of it. It began a relationship with Tim as a director and with Johnny Depp as an actor. You know, I got to go to England and make this ridiculously big and ridiculously weird movie, and it was an incredible, life-changing experience. So I canโ€™t have any regrets. You put yourself out there, you do the best you can and sometimes the movie gods are with you and sometimes theyโ€™re not.

Do you think youโ€™ll ever revisit vampires again, or have you gotten them out of your system at this point?

I donโ€™t know. Maybe eventually; never say never. But itโ€™s interesting; specifically, I feel like thereโ€™s more to Henry Sturgesโ€™ story, at least in terms of how it relates to the book. And Iโ€™ve been thinking about Henry a lot since I wrote Abe; thereโ€™s 400-some-odd years of history there that doesnโ€™t pertain to his actions with Abraham Lincoln, and you wonder how much more American history he was privy to. Whatever happened to him after he left the Roanoke Colony, and whatever happened to baby Virginia Dare? That stuff is bugging meโ€ฆ

Whatโ€™s the current status of your projects with KatzSmith Productions? Is the Beetlejuice sequel still going, and whatโ€™s up next for you guys?

Well, whatโ€™s next right now is Iโ€™m adapting my novel Unholy Night into a screenplay for Warner Bros., and producing that with David Heyman of the Harry Potter franchise. I just wrote an animated movie that Iโ€™m producing with Tim and trying to get him to direct, which would be one of his stop-motion pieces like Frankenweenie. That oneโ€™s based on an original idea Iโ€™ve had for a long time thatโ€™s an ode to classic monster movies. So those are the two immediate writing projects in terms of production.

Beetlejuice 2โ€”itโ€™s there, but again, what Iโ€™ve said about it before and what I truly believe is thatโ€ฆ Iโ€™ve sat down with Michael Keaton about it, Iโ€™ve talked to Tim about it and everybodyโ€™s interested and has said, โ€œYes, if we can crack the right story.โ€ But how I feel about it is, if youโ€™re just gonna do it as a cash grab or because you can, itโ€™s better not to do it. I donโ€™t want to be the guy who ruins the legacy of one of my favorite movies. If we can come up with something that makes sense and is cool, great, weโ€™ll give it a try. Otherwise, better to leave well enough alone, I think.

Similar Posts