Editor’s Note: This was originally published for FANGORIA on December 14, 2001, and we’re proud to share it as part of The Gingold Files.


A change in emphasis can be a dangerous thing when it comes to cinematic remakes, even when the material remains essentially the same. Thatโ€™s the lesson of Vanilla Sky, which writer/director Cameron Crowe adapted from Alejandro Amenรกbarโ€™s award-winning Spanish thriller Open Your Eyes. Crowe has never attempted a movie remotely like this before, and while thereโ€™s nothing wrong with an โ€œoutsideโ€ director stretching into the genre (we wouldnโ€™t have gotten The Exorcist or Silence of the Lambs, among others, if they didnโ€™t), Crowe resists treating Sky as genre for as long as possible, even as he maintains strict fidelity to Eyesโ€™ story. (Given how closely Skyโ€™s plot echoes that of Eyes, it was fun to watch Paramount, Crowe and co. bend over backwards to hide story details when any curious film buff could go out and rent the original.)

Tom Cruise certainly fits the bill as the storyโ€™s protagonist, here called David Aames, a narcissistic child of privilege who runs a publishing house he inherited from his father. (Eduardo Noriega, who played the lead role of Cรฉsar in Eyes, has been described as a โ€œSpanish Tom Cruise.โ€) Women fling themselves at Davidโ€™s feet, but heโ€™s not above singling out a friendโ€™s date for pursuit, specifically Sofia (Penelope Cruz, reprising her part from the original), whom his pal Brian (Jason Lee) brings to one of Davidโ€™s parties. Romantic sparks fly and they spend the night at Sofiaโ€™s apartment, but upon leaving the next morning, David is picked up by Julie (Cameron Diaz), a friend and โ€œfuck buddyโ€ who clearly takes their relationship more seriously than David does. Incensed by his dismissive attitude, she drives her car off a bridge, killing herself and leaving David badly scarred.

Right here is where Croweโ€™s approach deviates from Amenรกbarโ€™s. In Eyes, Cรฉsarโ€™s pursuer is Nurรญa, an obsessive, clearly unbalanced woman played by the slightly odd-looking Najwa Nimri. Her presence sets a menacing tone from the start, while Diazโ€™s Julie comes off as a vivacious, alluring woman who canโ€™t really be blamed for getting upset by the way David treats her. David describes her as a โ€œstalker,โ€ which certainly applies to Nimriโ€™s character but doesnโ€™t reflect the Julie we see. And nothing about Julie suggests sheโ€™d be the type to drive herself to her own death.

Then thereโ€™s the matter of the mood. Now, Iโ€™m not complaining about the lack of thriller ambiance just because Iโ€™m reviewing Sky for FANGORIA, but anyone familiar with Eyes will know that the story eventually heads off in some pretty off-kilter directions. Amenรกbar prepares the audience for them by suggesting that things arenโ€™t quite right from the start, but Crowe, even as he duplicates some of Amenรกbarโ€™s dialogue and shots, treats much of the story as a romantic drama. There are hints that Sky will take a dark turn (the film is framed as flashbacks by a masked David as he faces a murder charge and is interviewed by a psychiatrist played by Kurt Russell), but when things eventually do turn weird, it seems out of place.

Paradoxically, though, the final act is the most emotionally gripping part of Vanilla Sky; itโ€™s tautly played and does satisfyingly tie the story threads together. Up to and during this part of the film, Cruise is quite convincing as he rides an emotional rollercoaster, ultimately becoming unsure of what is and isnโ€™t real and dealing throughout with his physical disfigurement. (In keeping with Croweโ€™s down-to-earth approach, though, Michele Burkeโ€™s makeup avoids the true deformity Cรฉsar suffered in Eyes; David remains a clearly once-handsome man whoโ€™s suffered a bad battering.)

Cruz retains the appeal she had in Eyes and shares good chemistry with Cruise (no surprise, considering where their co-starring gig led), but without the threat that seemed to ominously hover on the sidelines in the first film, their onscreen relationship seems less urgent. (It feels draggy, too; even with the moviesโ€™ close similarity, Sky runs nearly 20 minutes longer than Eyes.) It will be interesting to see if mass audiences take to Sky, or whether theyโ€™ll be nonplussed by the radical tonal and narrative shifts it makes. Evidently Crowe wanted to expand the storyโ€™s appeal beyond genre fans (and devotees of the original might well feel betrayed by this version), but the ultimate irony could end up being that Amenรกbarโ€™s own The Others will wind up outgrossing Sky.

Similar Posts